11-16-2018, 02:18 PM
(11-16-2018, 01:38 PM)thor2014 Wrote:(11-16-2018, 11:52 AM)Paul1131 Wrote:(11-16-2018, 11:22 AM)thor2014 Wrote: Shannon when do you plan to have dmsi at a point where it fulfil users expectations as advertised ?
I’m pretty sure he PLANNED on that the first time he built the program.
Yes but i Want to know when we will have a fully working version as advertised l. He seems to love putting the blame on the customer oh you are resisting its your fault not mine.
Thor, sometimes you make me wonder if you have a brain in your head. I am not trying to be insulting, but that is genuinely what comes to mind with you sometimes. You asking me this question and saying this is not just insulting me, it's insulting you. Why? Because DMSI was working for you. It was getting you the results you are now so insultingly asking for. And then you chickened out and ran away to old technology that wasn't going to get you the same results. And that's why you ran away. You were executing, getting the results, and then you ran away. Now here you are asking me when it will work "as advertised". Ouch. I don't think you realize how bad that looks for you.
I have said this before, and I have said it before TO YOU personally AND others, but I will say it again. Because apparently, you don't understand this yet.
DMSI is experimental. The description page is a description page, not a sales page. It describes the program's GOALS, it does not make promises as to what the program is capable of doing now. The flaw here is that you are framing this as it being a finished product, the description being an advertisement, and the goals being "promises of what it will accomplish".
And the next time you come across as insultingly as you are in these two last posts of yours, I'm going to give you a warning for insulting me.
DMSI will be finished when it is finished, and until then, you will just have to wait. And as to whether or not it achieves it's goals, that will depend on how much time I spend answering stupid questions like these instead of working on it.
You have a history of pulling shit like this in the past that was so consistent that I was thinking you were a troll, and I was not far from issuing you warnings myself. Then you started actually executing DMSI, and I concluded you were not a troll. But this has me thinking you're back to trolling. Think before you post, Thor. I don't have a lot of patience left for stupid comments and questions at this point.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!