10-11-2018, 11:37 AM
No worries Shannon, it was more rhetorical than anything. However, this:
Very good to hear. I do think I'll notice the changes. And if not, I do have journals I can go over to compare dates, online interactions, general population reactions and etc.
(10-11-2018, 11:32 AM)Shannon Wrote:(10-11-2018, 08:41 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-11-2018, 08:24 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:Quote:I wouldn't switch over too soon if you want your results to be valid for me to use as data. How would we know which sub did what?
So then I'll wait for 3.3 to be a valid tester for that.
I want to be a valid tester but I can't stop using DMSI cause the celebrity effect helps in sales. Unfortunate that your program is so useful Shannon
Still, wish I could be valid to help move it in the direction it needs to go. Oh well.
Switching from (Not DMSI) to DMSI is going to produce a lotless useful data than (3.2) to (3.3). You know what 3.2 was doing, and you will be able to see the difference better. It's best to do no DMSI and no subs for the 35 days before, but still, 3.2 --> 3.3 is going to give us somewhat more valid data than (not DMSI) to DMSI.
Glad you're enjoying the celeb effect. I suspect that DMSI final is going to be very hard for most people to stop using for one reason or another along those lines.
Very good to hear. I do think I'll notice the changes. And if not, I do have journals I can go over to compare dates, online interactions, general population reactions and etc.