09-24-2018, 05:31 AM
(09-23-2018, 09:55 PM)Ricardo Wrote:(09-23-2018, 09:20 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-23-2018, 01:15 AM)Ricardo Wrote:(09-20-2018, 03:43 AM)CatMan Wrote: [quote='Roy' pid='206029' dateline='1537441279']
[quote='CatMan' pid='206023' dateline='1537432675']
I also don't really have a dog in the fight in the end, as I'm still not convinced the program will end up executing as the sales page conceptualises for the majority. Just seems like way too much of a leap from where things are now, to widespread results as conceptualised. Hard for me to get on board with until I see strongly encouraging results in line with it. I think I'll need a pretty large turnaround in results to believe in it. Just speaking about the history of AS and what he has said about what it may be doing, is all, done now. No interest in protracted walls of text. Whatever Shannon ends up going for is what we will have. I'm fine with it. I am not nearly as women focused as I used to be long ago, so it is definitely more of a side pursuit now. I do not know if that is some IDGAF, or just a counter reaction to failing to get traction with women. Either way, my interest has definitely fallen a great deal over the last year+. Which is good, I was too 'thirsty ' anyway and that is known to be a big turnoff. I felt low self respect for chasing like that too, so I view this new attitude as an improvement, regardless.
I have to echo this. When I look round in my daily life and see guys who just wouldn't be able to attract a fly, I wonder how DMSI could possibly work for them. The design goals are too ambitious. If DMSI works it would change mankind forever and Shannon would probably end up with more money than Soros and Bezos put together!
I think it would be more pragmatic to go with 5.5/6G AYP's.
We already know DMSI "works". It just does not work as intended yet. If it didn't work, nobody would have achieved the design goals.
That rather pre-supposes that anyone who had sex while listening to the sub did so because of it. You don't seem to accept that it might have happened anyway for them. I'm not having a go but I sometimes feel that you are the one with limiting beliefs here.
Either you haven't been keeping up with what has happened on the forum, or you are in a state of flat out self delusion to keep your safe, comfortable opinions what they are. Which, hey, I have seen other people do, so I suppose that is possible.
There are those cases where "it might have happened for them anyway" and there are those cases where DMSI did what it was designed to do, and it was beyond obvious. And given that, you're only making yourself look foolish with your stance at this point.
I'm not having a go either here, but seriously, pull your head out of the ground.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!