08-21-2018, 10:12 AM
Okay, so I have just finished catching up on this thread.
In order to be maximally productive today, I will not attempt to answer all possible posts that I have read. Instead, if you want your question answered, please re-post it, and I will answer it as time allows. I will be working on 3.3 now.
As for the looks vs game argument (which is what it boils down to), you guys are trying to oversimplify things a LOT, and that's why some of you swear by X and some of you swear by -(X).
If you were taking into account all variables you would be able to see when each point of view has value and why.
I have been working on this problem for a LONG time, and I can tell you, there are literally hundreds of things women/females consider when choosing what to respond to you with. I would say that after all that I have seen and done, ZeroX comes closes to what I have found to be true.
But women, like men, consider ALL of these things. And each one has a different amount of weight for each different female. So some women are "all about looks" and some are focused on energy, money, fame, status, fun and so forth. But ANY woman can be persuaded to change her mind in ANY direction, given the right actions and reactions from the male. The thing is, 99.999999999% of the time, the guy does not know all of what he needs to know to understand what he needs to do to achieve that end result. That is what DMSI is trying to do for you.
It is all about her perception of you and what her programming dictates that she does n response to that perception. And there are ways to communicate value/interesting-ness, without ever talking to her or even notice her.
Women, and men, are not black and white. They're not simple. They are all different. You can't say "all women/men/gays/straights/bis/whatever" are any one thing, because they're all unique individuals. And you have to take that into account.
Off to work, now.
And thank you all for the birthday wishes. I had a blast on my birthday.
In order to be maximally productive today, I will not attempt to answer all possible posts that I have read. Instead, if you want your question answered, please re-post it, and I will answer it as time allows. I will be working on 3.3 now.
As for the looks vs game argument (which is what it boils down to), you guys are trying to oversimplify things a LOT, and that's why some of you swear by X and some of you swear by -(X).
If you were taking into account all variables you would be able to see when each point of view has value and why.
I have been working on this problem for a LONG time, and I can tell you, there are literally hundreds of things women/females consider when choosing what to respond to you with. I would say that after all that I have seen and done, ZeroX comes closes to what I have found to be true.
But women, like men, consider ALL of these things. And each one has a different amount of weight for each different female. So some women are "all about looks" and some are focused on energy, money, fame, status, fun and so forth. But ANY woman can be persuaded to change her mind in ANY direction, given the right actions and reactions from the male. The thing is, 99.999999999% of the time, the guy does not know all of what he needs to know to understand what he needs to do to achieve that end result. That is what DMSI is trying to do for you.
It is all about her perception of you and what her programming dictates that she does n response to that perception. And there are ways to communicate value/interesting-ness, without ever talking to her or even notice her.
Women, and men, are not black and white. They're not simple. They are all different. You can't say "all women/men/gays/straights/bis/whatever" are any one thing, because they're all unique individuals. And you have to take that into account.
Off to work, now.
And thank you all for the birthday wishes. I had a blast on my birthday.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!