06-30-2018, 11:48 AM
(06-30-2018, 11:44 AM)DarkPlouf Wrote: Nobody's logic needs tweaking Shannon, no need to get defensive.
I wasn't being defensive. However, I do think that was unnecessary to say (your logic needs tweaking), so I apologize for that.
Quote:Looks like you did not understand why I asked you that.
That was coming from what I quoted - from your own words. As I said I found that odd you saying that. Basically, you said yourself "if there is a way" - which translate to "if it is possible". That condition wasn't established by me but you.
I just wanted some clarifications, and eventually hearing from what you'd do if the least desirable case appears to be true.
There is always a chance that it won't be possible for us to affect large numbers of people without taking away their free will. That is what I was referring to. I obviously don't think that is the case, or I would have stopped working on DMSI. But it is wise to always keep in mind what is possible, regardless.
Subliminal Audio Specialist & Administrator
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!
The scientist has a question to find an answer for. The pseudo-scientist has an answer to find a question for. ~ "Failure is the path of least persistence." - Chinese Fortune Cookie ~ Logic left. Emotion right. But thinking, straight ahead. ~ Sperate supra omnia in valorem. (The value of trust is above all else.) ~ Meowsomeness!