Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Thread-Vol-5)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Jake2015 - 07-22-2021

(07-22-2021, 08:49 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-22-2021, 01:29 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: @Shannon Hi mate, thanks for writing on my journal and suggesting Hybrid. Ive replied there and ill give it a shot. Incase you didnt have time to read the reply I asked a question that ill paste here for you.

Question: You have me on 13/15 volume for the US track, what would you like me to do for hybrid please?

thanks mate!

extra: So I just update my journal and had a realisation that im sharing from my journal here incase you want to change any strategy for me @Shannon. As a reminder the strategy was to increase loops to a max of 8 or 9 and then if need be increase days ON. Now you said hybrid and so this is what I realised...

"I have also realised I think, and I emphasise that I think, that usually on the 2nd ON day I feel more fear - maybe because sometimes im unaware of the fear but anyway on the 2nd ON day - I then feel glad and grateful I have 2 off days because today I was thinking the same that thankfully tomorrow is an off day, so this seems to be the case and ill make mention of this to @Shannon incase he wants to change strategy for me."

I wanna smash through this fear whatever is it.

Jake, I'm getting a little impatient with you.  You are doing the same old shit, again and again, for years now.  Nothing happened... nothing happened... and then we find something that does work, and you immediately find ways to claim again and again that nothing happened.

This is a resistance tactic.  It's called self delusion.  And it annoys the shit out of me, because everyone else can see it's working but the user finds ways, reasons excuses and lies to tell themselves it's not.

I suggested hybrid because I'm just tired of this bullshit.  Listening to you get results, and then "Oh, I guess that wasn't results, nothing, nothing, nothing..." every day, sometimes multiple times a day.

So why don't we skip to the good part.  Let's switch you to hybrid format at 4 loops and just go up from there and save ourselves 5 weeks of this.  And if 8 or 9 loops of hybrid doesn't work for you, then we'll know that nothing I do will ever work for you, and you can find something else to try.

I dont mean to have this "self delusion" and not on purpose. I also dont know where it HAS worked for me so far. yes im exhibiting types of resistance, 4 - 5 types of resistances but I cant say it has worked yet in terms of fear as I haven't noticed any of my fears being lessened or removed or anything for me to say it has worked. Im journalling daily giving data that I myself cant see for sure when or how the sub has worked, so unsure what you mean when you said it works. I know others also are saying it is working for me but im unsure where myself as its fears im dealing with and fears im looking at for certainty it is working. 

I will go onto hybrid then mate and give that a shot, thank you. Sorry for the trouble.

But the question remains, what volume for hybrid? 13/15 is what you had me on for US. I assume for hybrid though its whatever is tolerable for the mask to be heard comfortably?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - THolt - 07-22-2021

(07-21-2021, 08:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-21-2021, 06:48 PM)Raykon Wrote: How's everything going with NSLW, I know you've had personal matters / life to deal with, so no pressure just curious.

I haven't had a chance to do anything new on NLSW yet.  That was planned for after E5 comes out.  So far it looks like the limits I have hit trying to build E5 may take all of the time figuring out a solution, which would leave me the option of releasing E5 and then building Stage 3 of UMSv2 instead.  But let's hope that I can find a solution later today and get on with publishing E5 in time.

Hmm this creates a dilemma for me regarding which program to run after OF V3. UMS 2.0 or E5? I am leaning towards the latter but we will see!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - DMSIuser78 - 07-22-2021

(07-22-2021, 08:51 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(07-22-2021, 02:01 AM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: @Shannon 
Quote:The script of the E5 program, under its current settings, is so big that we are hitting limits in the software I am using. My TTS can't handle it, apparently. Going to have to find an adjustment...

Does that mean that E5 will end up being less powerful and/or encompassing than it could have been if it wasn't for technical limitations in your build tools?


If I can't build it the way it was originally configured, it won't be less powerful, it will just take more time, as in more loops.

Good to hear, because I feel that either E5 or Universal Healing is probably what I'll want to run after OFv3 Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - THolt - 07-23-2021

@Shannon

Really want to run E5 but I know a complete run of OF V3 will make E5 work better. So I will wait! Ha


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Zeroxmachina - 07-24-2021

(07-20-2021, 02:59 PM)fab10 Wrote:
Quote:Unlocking previous subs? Wow that's great news.
Ya, that caught my eye too.

I have about 5 years of DMSI programming at this point, and I can say that unlocking is not really the right word. But it's not the wrong word, either. I notice the interest spike in terms of stuff like online dating sites but I wouldn't say the aura or the need is there. It's more like it probably frees up the resources your subconscious would usually be using to reinforce certain fears and applies them to other programming to an extent. In my humble opinion.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 07-24-2021

(07-24-2021, 08:12 AM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(07-20-2021, 02:59 PM)fab10 Wrote:
Quote:Unlocking previous subs? Wow that's great news.
Ya, that caught my eye too.

I have about 5 years of DMSI programming at this point, and I can say that unlocking is not really the right word. But it's not the wrong word, either. I notice the interest spike in terms of stuff like online dating sites but I wouldn't say the aura or the need is there. It's more like it probably frees up the resources your subconscious would usually be using to reinforce certain fears and applies them to other programming to an extent. In my humble opinion.

Unlocking means freeing up to express without repression by fear. It does not mean that effects that require constant exposure to remain operational (such as an aura) will suddenly be free energy devices.  Whatever is still running of previous subs will not be stopped by fear. That is what unlocking previous subs means.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Wiseg9999 - 07-24-2021

hi,
can i try 4 loops of OF v3, 2 days on and 2 days off?
(currently on 3 loops)

not feeling anything. thanks for suggestions.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - LionMonkey - 07-26-2021

Hey Shannon

Three questions:

1) For those of us who use music players that doesn't support FLAC.

I googled that you can convert FLAC to ALAC easily, without losing quality.

Can you recommend that?

Reason I'm asking is the other music player I use for FLAC takes a huge toll on battery usage compared to the native music player.


2) Sooner or later, you gotta find a baseline to run OF v3 on no?
The more popular subliminals get, the more people will use them.

Leading to more questions specificly about usage pattern and time of the 5.75.7G subs

And you only have so much time to read and reply to everyone.

As it is supposed to be unique to every individual?

I'm curious how you did the testing of the effectiveness of the 5.75.7G subs and why the standard is set as it is with 1-2 loops for 2 days and 3 days off, and so on...


3) If one should go for intuition, I feel I could handle much more loops, like I feel 4 hours (by mistake) the first night was near the edge of what I felt good about.

So I'm thinking - today is my 3rd day OFF and tonight I'm looping again for the next 2 days but instead of going 2 loops, I feel like 4-6 loops would be good testing grounds.

What do you think about that? Should I trust intuition/feeling this early in the new sub usages?

Thx!!

-LM


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Habib - 07-26-2021

Hi @Shannon I'm currently listening to OF 3 and I have a couple questions about auto config.

First, how does it work or how does it affect the user? I've been listening to trickling masked since the beginning. But for some reason, I had the urge to listen to 3 loops in US format before going to bed last night. I can more or less understand about the 3 loops part. My question would be "why US format?". Is auto config responsible for this? Can it demand a particular format to listen to like this or is it just me being weird?

The second one would be what would happen if I were to neglect auto config and stick to the recommended listening pattern for my entire run?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Kol - 07-26-2021

@Shannon what is your overall policy regarding video posts? I mean, having videos in your journal. Is it discouraged, whats the general protocol? I can imagine it being heavy on the servers, so im sort of try to minimalize it, frankly out of fear of exactly that, serverload.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 07-26-2021

(07-24-2021, 03:57 PM)Wiseg9999 Wrote: hi,
can i try 4 loops of OF v3, 2 days on and 2 days off?
(currently on 3 loops)

not feeling anything. thanks for suggestions.

If you're not yet seeing results, then follow a progression of +1 loops per ASRB2 cycle until you get to a full night of loops or achieve results.  If that still doesn't do it, start adding days on.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 07-26-2021

(07-26-2021, 05:47 AM)LionMonkey Wrote: Hey Shannon

Three questions:

1) For those of us who use music players that doesn't support FLAC.

I googled that you can convert FLAC to ALAC easily, without losing quality.

Can you recommend that?

Reason I'm asking is the other music player I use for FLAC takes a huge toll on battery usage compared to the native music player.

If you haven't read this:

https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-New-audio-format-request

Then do so now.  It's better to use the MP3 than to transcode it for those reasons, if you're not willing to use the FLAC.



Quote:2) Sooner or later, you gotta find a baseline to run OF v3 on no?
The more popular subliminals get, the more people will use them.

Leading to more questions specificly about usage pattern and time of the 5.75.7G subs

And you only have so much time to read and reply to everyone.

As it is supposed to be unique to every individual?

I'm curious how you did the testing of the effectiveness of the 5.75.7G subs and why the standard is set as it is with 1-2 loops for 2 days and 3 days off, and so on...

The goal is to have AutoConfig set course for each individual.  But I do calculate starting points for the instructions.  5.75.7G is such new technology that we had to start very low to make sure it wasn't overkill.  I'm trying to adjust to the patterns I see resulting from my instructions.  In the near future, I'm going to make the AutoConfig much more powerful so it works for pretty much everyone.  

Testing is mostly done using my predictive models.  There is no way I could reliably test these things with people alone anymore, given the general unreliability of testers, the scarcity of people suitable for testing and the impossibility of me overseeing testing in person to catch misunderstandings and misconceptions that the tester may have.  I have only a very small handful of human testers who have proven reliable.  Testing using only humans would immediately grind our progress to a halt because the testing would require 6 to 18 months for each title and each advancement I make at this point, and that's not to say we would only have to wait that long because the development requires months too.  

The standard is set also by the predictive models as a starting point which will not overwhelm those who are unfamiliar with 5.75.7G and which can be adjusted from if necessary, while still being effective for most people.


Quote:3) If one should go for intuition, I feel I could handle much more loops, like I feel 4 hours (by mistake) the first night was near the edge of what I felt good about.

So I'm thinking - today is my 3rd day OFF and tonight I'm looping again for the next 2 days but instead of going 2 loops, I feel like 4-6 loops would be good testing grounds.

What do you think about that? Should I trust intuition/feeling this early in the new sub usages?

Thx!!

-LM

The AutoConfig isn't your intuition.  It giving you instructions is coming from some of the same parts that govern your intuition, but the AutoConfg is not intuition or "psychic guidance".  It's designed to cause your cooperative subconscious to figure out the optimal usage patterns for you and communicate that to your conscious mind through urges and desires to do those things.

You can move up to 4x a day on, but first you should make sure you're not using too many days off per ASRB2 cycle.  For some people 3 days off is too much.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 07-26-2021

(07-26-2021, 07:48 AM)Habib Wrote: Hi @Shannon I'm currently listening to OF 3 and I have a couple questions about auto config.

First, how does it work or how does it affect the user? I've been listening to trickling masked since the beginning. But for some reason, I had the urge to listen to 3 loops in US format before going to bed last night. I can more or less understand about the 3 loops part. My question would be "why US format?". Is auto config responsible for this? Can it demand a particular format to listen to like this or is it just me being weird?

The second one would be what would happen if I were to neglect auto config and stick to the recommended listening pattern for my entire run?

AutoConfig uses the cooperative parts of your own subconscious mind to find the best usage settings for you regarding the title you're using in order to achieve the program's goals.  It then communicates these instructions to the conscious mind through urges and desires.  When you get these urges, follow them.  

As to your question, "Why ultrasonic?" I can only guess because I am not your subconhscious mind.  Ultrasonic offers a very good option for presenting the instructions in a forceful - but not too forceful - manner.  Perhaps its volume will hit the right parts of your subconscious mind; perhaps the volume hits at the right level of perceptory pressure to push through resistance.  Perhaps other things.  But yes, that does sound like AutoConfig.  It can find all of the right variables needed, including loops, days on, days off, volume, format, etc.  Whichever variables are most importsnt, it will figure out and then communicate to the conscious mind.

If you ignore autoconfig, then you're not going to get as good an outcome, presuming you're experiencing AutoConfig.  (Which I think you are.)


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Thread, Vol. 5 - Shannon - 07-26-2021

(07-26-2021, 07:55 AM)Kol Wrote: @Shannon  what is your overall policy regarding video posts? I mean, having videos in your journal. Is it discouraged, whats the general protocol? I can imagine it being heavy on the servers, so im sort of try to minimalize it, frankly out of fear of exactly that, serverload.

Video posts become problematic because they tend to require more time, and that makes moderating them more difficult.  They also require a lot more space, as you say, and this is a forum, not YouTube.  We don't have an issue with video posts, as long as you abide by the rules of the forum within them, but you should keep them as short as possible.  In general, unless you have some reason why you need to use a video post as opposed to text, you should prefer text.  Video posts are useful for expressing emotion better, demonstrating things, and sharing things which are better expressed through visual or action oriented media.