(08-29-2025, 01:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-29-2025, 07:47 AM)Catman Wrote: Sounds reasonable, and avoids the obvious chance of people doing "MOAR POWAR!!1!" then complaining about side effects and massive overkill anyway. 



I suspected the version's instructions would differ due to one having the DRS V2 inclusion, makes sense.



Originally, my plan was to do V5.0 to fully focus for a run on doing the work needed to step up to full execution. As that avoids "splitting the focus" and making DMSI have the best chance to succeed. I remember you've always said the reality that splitting the focus means each program gets less of the pie in your analogy, no matter how you slice it.



I guess what I'm asking is, does V5.0 really have a much stronger focus and aura than V5.1 does? But V5.1 has more overall utility due to DRS V2?

I can only comment based on what I have seen from the models.  Both show function.  5.0 shows a more "dirty" result and 5.1 shows a "cleaner" result.  In effect, this shows the results of filtering out the negativity as DRS does.  I'm not sure how else to describe what the models are showing.



5.0 has focus split with FRM; 5.1 has focus split with FRM and DRS.  There is not an even split of focus.  That is to say, FRM does not get 50% and DMSI 50% for 5.0, and it's not 33.33% for each for 5.1.  FRM is dynamic, and so in the beginning, it will tend to take the lion's share of the focus and energy if you need it; much less if you don't.  DRS will take some energy, plus the shield will take some energy, but again,these are dynamic.  They power up as needed.  This was the best solution I could come up with.  Not perfect, but better by far than a simple static division.

Quote:What do you mean about: "The DRS included will make a significant difference in what the results are."? I know DRS V2 can apparently help with anxiety in some situations, which seems logical. Did you mean that or something similar? Or was it just really about the listening regimen being much different which would make sense if it was?

Well first you have the effect of the negativity being filtered out, which results in less anxiety and a lot more comfort executing and growing into the goals of DMSI.  Then you have the effects it has on those who would try to control or attack you for daring to stand out, or affect a woman you find attractive.  Guys may try to energetically attack you with guilt shame or fear; women may also.  Getting this right back from you and you being unphased is not going to go un-noticed.  Especially from women you're attracted to who try to "test" or manipulate or attack you for your DMSI aura.



I'm not trying to sell you on 5.1, which is why I simply asked which one you'd like. but I would sure as hell be using DRS with DMSI in some way if I wasn't well versed in attraction, seduction, dating and sex.

Quote:Thanks so much for clarifying and for the regimen that's incoming.



That said, I have seen some things happen in V5.0 in the short time I've used it. A couple dreams relevant, annoying skyrocketing appetite that always happens on DMSI that it causes weight gain even if not careful, haha...heat...some m wood situations, lol...etc. and a lot of motor mouth from others which can be a bit annoying at times even though I'm very social, haha...so it's not a total loss so far! Just to clarify.



EDIT: I just saw your bar story. That kind of thing happens to me too...but since nothing develops I just chalk it up to nothing or making mountains out of molehills etc. Or you take the signal that is "obvious" (it's not obvious ever, and you always need to read way in and risk getting burned) and suddenly it goes wrong and you're in the wrong somehow. That happens too, they switch up. But I do see these things, even on X4A and earlier. Lots of stories I could tell of similar situations, and switch ups too sadly that defy logic to this day. Socially I'm extremely strong due to my background, but I guess there's an invisible wall from that point to romantic/sexual for me. But just wanted to add context after reading your post. That is a somewhat common occurrence to me, that I never really think is a big deal because it doesn't go anywhere even with pushing to make something happen. It's a bizarre experience, this invisible wall. We'll see if we can remove it!

My experience last night at the bar could have resulted in sex with any of those three women, if I had played my cards right.  I was intentionally being passive because I am involved, and because I cannot see what they will do if I do it for them.  The key in my experience is, don't try to get to sex too fast.  You need to match or slightly over-match her position.  That takes practice for most guys.  But when DMSI gets going full tilt, you should have women approaching you, offering to you, etc. - although it may not be super obvious in most public situations. (Unless she's drunk, at which point, she's really off limits regardless.)



When you run DMSI, you shouldn't be looking for results.  Just let it do it's thing.  Go along with it when it starts guiding you in a seductive direction, or socially.  It wouldn't be by saying "Hey, wanna fuck?" that I would get to sex with any of those three women.  It would be through socializing with them, playful banter, and either letting them grow their interest into it or leading them that direction in subtle ways.  V was sober, and at work.  It would take some time to get her to do anything outside of work, if that was my goal, but I could.



The girl with sharp eyes was drinking shots.  I tend to avoid women after they have imbibed alcohol for obvious reasons, but it would have been relatively easy to socialize and have fun with her, if I could find common ground to talk about.  Maybe suggest a different venue, maybe suggest a shot I like, etc. The responses she gave tell me that she was already aroused, had noticed me, had concluded she was aroused by me specifically, and that she thought I wasn't interested, so she gave up.  I could have taken it further if I'd socialized.  And maybe that day wasn't ideal for achieving sex, but there's always the next.  And so on.



The woman on the laptop was there with her husband or fiance.  I could have managed that one, too, if I was that kind of guy, but it's a lot less direct.  And also much less easy to do the same day.  Obviously you adjust to the circumstances.  



But if you want them to approach you, you need to be fully, or nearly fully, executing DMSI.  Even then, not everyone will approach, and they may need multiple exposures to approach.  



The results you're getting tell me that you are to some degree executing, which is good news.  It would be really helpful if you would start reporting, not only so I can know what's going on, but be able to make suggestions.

Shannon Wrote:I am working on DMSI v5.1 release.

I have almost everything ready for release. Currently calculating the usage patterns.

Hopefully, this will be published on (Saturday), August 30th, 2025, Eastern US time. But it will not be early in the day if it is.

4Kingdoms Wrote:If you have a subscription for v5.0, finish out the month.
Then, consider switching to v5.1 with DRS-Directional Reflection Shield, to stop potential cockblockers, “work” husbands, protective girlfriends, & envious friends/family from sabotaging you.

v5.1 is a time saver. 
If you are using DRS with another 6G title, use DRS for 2 loops per day, without interruptions. 1 loop is 60 mins.

(08-30-2025, 02:18 PM)Catman Wrote: Hello @Shannon,

Today is the big day, huh?

Where are we with DMSI V5.1's release?

(08-30-2025, 03:13 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: How about  the Celebrity Effect as a stand alone, sub, with some extra goodies added in for good measure?

(08-30-2025, 02:47 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(08-30-2025, 02:18 PM)Catman Wrote: Hello @Shannon,

Today is the big day, huh?

Where are we with DMSI V5.1's release?

Well, I had to throw away and completely re-calculate what I managed to get yesterday, because apparently I was too tired to be running the models accurately and today's verification checks completely failed.  So I just finished calculating the usage patterns for normal use, and I am working on Hard Cases.  I expect it will be published later tonight, but there is a slim chance it will be tomorrow instead.  And of course, your instructions will have to be calculated after that.

The description should be good, but I still need to add the hashes.

(08-30-2025, 10:04 PM)Catman Wrote: Congrats on V5.1, @Shannon.



After downloading and testing the files briefly afterwards, I learned of a potential issue.



The 20 min and 35 min ultrasonic audio appears to be about 15-20 decibels lower than V5.0's equivalent file.



The others appear to be more or less the same volume, from V5.0 to V5.1.



Given how the volume requirements seem to be louder for both use cases, and presumably for mine as well compared to V5.0's, and how ultrasonic is supposed to be the standard format used to start, I felt it worth reporting this in case of an issue.



Thanks so much for building this sub.

(08-31-2025, 02:42 AM)Bignoise Wrote: I purchased DMSI 5.0, the download rights, the day it came out, and I paid the full price as I joined the party at 3.x. It seems I’m the only one ?. I also have DRS 6G, and I can use them together, but… any chance I can get DMSI 5.1 for free just to save some listening time?

(08-31-2025, 02:42 AM)Bignoise Wrote: I purchased DMSI 5.0, the download rights, the day it came out, and I paid the full price as I joined the party at 3.x. It seems I’m the only one ?. I also have DRS 6G, and I can use them together, but… any chance I can get DMSI 5.1 for free just to save some listening time?

(08-05-2025, 11:15 AM)Bignoise Wrote: I think this poll has not many sense.

If you can get DMSI for free, you can then pay the DRS standalone and use them together. ($650)
Or you can can pay for DMSI 5.1 including DRS for the same price, $650.
If you are going to pay $650 anyway, it's better to have the DRS standalone, so you can use it with another 6G title in the future.

Only new buyers would benefit from this 5.1 version, but I guess they are not the candidates for this poll.

(08-07-2025, 07:50 AM)Shannon Wrote: If you have paid for DRS, and you can get DMSI v5.0 for free, and you don't mind spending the time necessary to use them both, then buying DMSI v5.1 would not make sense. 

But, if you want the convenience of being able to use them both at once, and the reduction in listening time (time is money), then having them both in one is going to be worth paying for.  Even if you're not a new buyer.

DMSI v5 will suffice for most.  For those who value the time and convenience sufficiently, DMSI v5.1 would probably actually save them money in some cases, because again, time is money.