+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
RE: Shannon's Journal - jonathanzx10 - 01-21-2012
so no name embeds till next year? how about an exception for alpha male since many people have resistance with that one?
RE: Shannon's Journal - HMoody - 01-21-2012
I'd Vote for SM 2.0 so that as soon as I finish AM2011 I can dive into that one! Though I'd be cool with AM2012 as well since I've bought SM 1.0 but have not tried it out yet as I want to finish AM 2011 first.
RE: Shannon's Journal - Benjamin - 01-21-2012
Damn no customs this year!
After feeling how hard my custom ideal weight hit me on the first few nights. I did have it planned to get my next thing custom. Most likely AM 5.0 or SM 2.0.
Though i've got 6 months or so to complete ideal weight anyway. So I shouldn't worry too much.
-Ben
RE: Shannon's Journal - AwesomeYoungDude - 01-21-2012
Shannon, I got the impression that the 4G six stage weight loss about to be released is part one of a series. Its goal is to achieve ones ideal weight. Part two would work to maintain that weight. Is that a correct understanding. If so is part two required and how many stage are you planning for part 2.
AYD
RE: Shannon's Journal - ncbeareatingman - 01-21-2012
Looking forward to the Alternative Alpha Male,I see so many places where I need to clean up and git fit emotionally and STAND UP for MY own beingness with knuckle heads in life and thick headed muther-fucka's and over all. I dont mind saying it I NEED to git back IN shape on several levels and remain even more true to self while serving others in life that is.... this already- Alpha Male- aint ashamed to say " THis Alpha Needs a re-do, a Make Over" and IM more than willing to walk over the preverbial coals to do! Lets git it ON. come spring,Im hoping the Gay Alpha Male Dominant set will be ready and I for it. there are just as many gay men out there playing the same bullshit games as str8 females and st8 males alike. Bullshit is Bullshit = being incongruent, NO follow thru on ones word,ect, insincerity,blah blah blah AND A HOST OF other things that equate BOWL-SHIT(southern accent optional) there some deep seated neediness that I need to heal and/or squash out of fear of survival. IM ready Man,Im ready.
I feel this Alpha 2012 is gonna let me be and be 'into' the Man I already AM ,AROUND OTHERS,especially.
for that all to show thru more and more often, when around others. would love to hear some feedback from Men whose transended that or are well on thier way to'bullshit removal' classes with Alpha Male 2011/2012(when it comes out)
RE: Shannon's Journal - Shannon - 01-21-2012
@ jonathanzx10: The whole point of the problem I have with making customs is that each one must be built individually. The programs you guys love so much are the big huge extremely powerful super-complex and super difficult-to-build ones. If I make an exception for AM, I am just shooting myself in the foot because the whole point is to not be distracted from doing the work that I have been trying to get to for about a year now. Customs stop me from upgrading the old stuff from 3G to 4G, and they stop me from building new titles also. If I start doing customs again, the catalog becomes stagnant. I know you all love my custom work, and I love doing it... sometimes... (four times building AYIW customs was not entertaining, lol) but I need to make advances in the catalog before I can worry about customs again. They'll be available again in the future. But I cannot maintain the level of quality I require and keep the catalog growing and do customs and do the research I am doing to make these programs even better in the future. I am only one man, and I trust nobody else to be as perfectionist as I am about making these things right. For now, the customs have to stop, and the research will have to slow down too.
@ AwesomeYoungDude: You have the understanding of my plansfor AYIW correct. Part 2 is currently envisioned as either a 3 or 6 stage set, depending on how it ends up requiring being built to properly achieve its goal.
@ ncbeareatingman: After contemplating it for a while, it should not be very difficult for me to build the version of AM 5.0 for gay men after the standard version has been completed. I would expect that the gay version should be released within about a week of the straight version.
RE: Shannon's Journal - Ryan - 01-22-2012
Invite sent!
Ryan
RE: Shannon's Journal - Shannon - 01-22-2012
(01-22-2012, 12:10 PM)Ryan Wrote: Invite sent!
Ryan
Thank you, sir.
RE: Shannon's Journal - RainbowAbyss - 01-22-2012
Shannon will the SM 2.0 version for all woman still attract plenty of single woman/will the version at attracting single woman-be better at attracting single woman or just as good but ONLY attract single woman. Also in NYC I've never met an attractive woman who doesn't have some kind of guy in her life, well, there single but usually never longer than 2 weeks to a month!
RE: Shannon's Journal - Shannon - 01-22-2012
(01-22-2012, 02:24 PM)RainbowAbyss Wrote: Shannon will the SM 2.0 version for all woman still attract plenty of single woman/will the version at attracting single woman-be better at attracting single woman or just as good but ONLY attract single woman. Also in NYC I've never met an attractive woman who doesn't have some kind of guy in her life, well, there single but usually never longer than 2 weeks to a month!
After thinking about it long and hard - and being single for a long time because of it also - I have come to believe that humans are designed for competition in the mating game, and that he who hesitates is lost. Therefore, I have made the decision that there will only be one released version of SM 2.0, and that it will remove ALL "safeties" concerning taken women. It will now work to attract, and I quote, "all physically beautiful women who are within the age range I prefer" and try to get them to want to and actually have sex with the user. Whether they or the user is single or not.
What you do with, to and/or about them is your choice. Worst case scenario is that you find yourself constantly telling beautiful women that no, they cannot have sex with you. And what is that going to do but get you insane social proof, and make even more of them show up to offer you access to their prized eggs? Cause really that's all it boils down to is genes telling us we need to reproduce.
As for women in NYC, that city is possibly the worst in the world for being a meat market for women. They have whatever they want, and relationships tend to be of little value there because it is by and large considered a sea of endless bounty for women, by the women who live there. They know that a new male is easily available when the last one is no longer interesting, obedient, useful, what have you, and so they will usually be found to switch men frequently. That's not true of all women there of course, but it is the rule, and not the exception, from what I have seen.
RE: Shannon's Journal - jamboree - 01-22-2012
I guess "age range that I prefer" will work. I have a wide range preference. From 20s to low 50s.
RE: Shannon's Journal - Shannon - 01-22-2012
(01-22-2012, 03:32 PM)jamboree Wrote: I guess "age range that I prefer" will work. I have a wide range preference. From 20s to low 50s.
I don't see a better way to make it do what you want and have it work for everyone at the same time... do you?
RE: Shannon's Journal - jamboree - 01-22-2012
(01-22-2012, 04:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:(01-22-2012, 03:32 PM)jamboree Wrote: I guess "age range that I prefer" will work. I have a wide range preference. From 20s to low 50s.
I don't see a better way to make it do what you want and have it work for everyone at the same time... do you?
No worries Shannon. I agree. Its difficult to get language right that will cover the needs of a wide variety of users and their preferences. For me, age is not a biggee if I am using SM, as long as the woman is gorgeous. To me, SM is more for playing the field and not really to settle down, so better to keep options wide and open. For the younger users, if you meet a stunner, do you really care how old she is for sex? Look at Ryan and the fun he is having with an older woman. Now when I want to settle down, age becomes more of a factor.
RE: Shannon's Journal - Shannon - 01-22-2012
I am having a hard time maintaining enough mental focus and energy to complete today's work goal. The script is so long and complex and I am making many optimizations and adjustments to it... I fear that I will never be able to adequately describe everything I have done to improve it. One of the things I'm doing, though, is making it focus more on having women approach and initiate sex with the user. Also have it making it more obvious that the user is heterosexual... lol
Also gonna have a gay version be built. Which of course does not make the user seem heterosexual.
Also enhancing the detection of women who have an STD.